Essential website updates between 07:00-07:15am CEST 19 September 2025 may cause disruption.

Why healthcare needs to be unbundled and rebundled

Too many health systems now fragment care and escalate costs. True transformation requires taking apart and rebuilding healthcare systems for patients.

Low- and Middle-Income Countries have an opportunity to leapfrog fragmented healthcare systems and build approaches that work for citizens. Image: Theodore Ghoutas/Unsplash
Low- and Middle-Income Countries have an opportunity to leapfrog fragmented healthcare systems and build approaches that work for citizens. Image: Theodore Ghoutas/Unsplash
 

 

  • Most health systems serve institutions rather than patients, creating fragmentation, rigidity and escalating costs.
  • Real transformation requires unbundling rigid blocks into modular services tailored to patients.
  • Rebundling around patient journeys with shared infrastructure, data-driven workflows and outcome-based financing improves healthcare.

Many health systems around the world are failing patients. From Dhaka to Nairobi to Detroit, our health systems were primarily built to provide acute care and designed to serve institutions – government, hospitals, insurers – not patients or caregivers. Every attempt to digitize them, meanwhile hits the same wall: a misaligned and unsustainable architecture – effective at emergencies, but ill-suited for long-term health.

More money, more technology, including AI, will not fix a flawed system. The problem isn’t tools. It’s architecture.

Rewired healthcare is about building health systems for people, not patching them for institutions. The future needs the architecture of healthcare systems to be built around outcomes that matter people living healthier, longer, at lower cost and using technology smartly to get there.

Rashida’s story

Rashida who is from a village outside Dhaka, is pregnant, diabetic and lives with a husband recently treated for tuberculosis.

She doesn’t know her health status or options. If lucky, a community health worker visits—but her care is split across three vertical programmes: maternal health, NCDs and TB. Individually, these programmes work. Together, they fail. Her diabetes medication isn’t checked for pregnancy safety. Her antenatal record isn’t visible. Her household TB risk is never flagged.

Rashida ends up with incomplete care, while the health worker juggles disconnected protocols and paperwork that rewards reporting, not results. At the health facility, her records don’t follow and her expenses escalate. Local administrators see only partial reports, unable to plan resources effectively.

Each programme is a siloed monolith: isolated, rigid and unable to adapt. When these collide, care fragments and the system falters. Simply digitizing more won’t fix this. AI layered on top will only create more confusion. Only an intentional architectural redesign enabled by technology can solve these problems.

From fragmentation to flow: Redesigning health systems architecture

Healthcare today is fragmented because it is delivered in clunky blocks. These include vertical programmes, community health cut off from facilities, hospitals siloed by department, separate public and private systems and insurers defining narrow benefits. Each clunky block bundles services, protocols and data into its own rigid monolith.

To achieve flow, we must unbundle these monoliths into functional components: discovery, navigation, diagnosis, planning, treatment, monitoring and prevention. Each of these can be modular services that are delivered where and when they best serve the patient. These can then be rebundled with technology to maximize outcomes and efficiency.

Here’s what that could look like for Rashida:

She feels unwell. An AI assistant in Bangla answers her questions, screens for red flags and books the next step. A health worker visits and completes the care protocol using one tool, syncing everything to her record.

Instead of fragmented services, Rashida experiences fully coordinated care. Prescriptions are safety-checked, linked to pharmacies and paid transparently. She receives timely reminders and counselling, abnormal readings trigger proactive outreach, her hospital care plan follows seamlessly and newborn immunisation and postpartum care are integrated.

Dashboards could show the full picture with indicators, supply alerts and outcomes, all while protecting consent and privacy. Financing aligns so payment systems reward prevention and coordination over fragmented, crisis-driven interventions.

This is healthcare rewired: one patient, a unified care plan and a comprehensive payment backbone. It is a health system that follows the patient, not the other way around — and achievable with the right architecture.

The leapfrog opportunity

Other sectors have already transformed. Banking once separated loans, savings and payments, but now integrates them seamlessly around the customer. Telecoms did the same with voice, data and messaging. Healthcare has resisted, leaving rigidity from monoliths and chaos from fragmentation.

It is often assumed that low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) can’t afford to re-architect health systems. The opposite is true. With legacy systems never fully calcified, LMICs can leapfrog challenges to build stronger, patient-centric digital foundations from the start.

Most efforts so far have produced a messy patchwork of vertical apps, partial registries, siloed dashboards and a rush of AI tools layered haphazardly on top. The result is brittle: data does not flow, workflows duplicate and guidance stays locked in binders. Interoperability helps systems “talk,” but on its own it cannot create the foundations of care delivery.

Real transformation needs a shared infrastructure layer. This is the foundation for every program, provider and innovation. Beyond health IDs and registries, they require building blocks: patient profiles, workflow engines, knowledge libraries, payment rails and interfaces for existing apps.

As shared assets governed by open standards, these blocks let monolithic programmes be unbundled into functional services. This must be rebundled around the patient journey. That is the path to resilient, future-ready health systems. In these rebundled systems information drives care, workflows are optimized, knowledge is embedded in every interaction, innovations scale quickly and payments tie to real outcomes.

The tests of a rewired health system

How do we know if the system is working? In the long run, the test is simple:

  • Outcomes – Do patients get better? Can they find, afford and complete care that improves health? Is it trustworthy?
  • Data – How is data used at every level to improve outcomes and efficiency?
  • Cost – Are we paying for outcomes, not episodes of care? Can we reduce overall costs while improving population health?

In most places today, the answer to these questions is no. In a rewired system, each becomes a design goal.

The bottom line

Our healthcare architecture is flawed and must be redesigned. The rewired model starts with a simple question: “If we built this system today, for the people it’s meant to serve, what would it look like?”

The answer is not more apps or AI on top of a broken system. It lies in creating a patient-centred, modular system designed to learn and evolve.

It’s time to build that system. It’s time to rewire healthcare.